Sorry, not a very descriptive title, is it?
I’m feeling slightly less ambivalent about getting involved with ALA than I did a year ago. Mainly, that is because if the awesome LITA people I meet at Annual in June. Despite that, it still took me until yesterday to remember that I needed to renew my lapsed membership. Whoops.
I ended up deciding to join LITA, and since my professional focus currently resides with the Serials Section of ALCTS, I ended up dropping ACRL. Even so, my membership cost more than $200. For one year. Yeouch. The sad thing is that I’m not sure I’ll have much energy left to get my $200 worth out of it. We’ll see.
This leads me to a question I have been pondering for a bit. I’ve been thinking about my career and where I’d like to eventually end up, and I’m thinking more and more that I want to be in a smaller university or college library where the emphasis is on being librarians and less on being tenure-track faculty. The pros are that I would be able to stop worrying so much about publications and be able to focus on my strengths like being a (freakin’ awesome*) serials & electronic resources librarian and serving in various professional organizations as well as campus committees. The cons are that I probably won’t have as much support for attending conferences and likely the salary scale would be lower.
So, the question I’m pondering is whether ALA is worth being a member of if one cannot participate on committees because one cannot afford to attend all of the conferences?
* Sorry. I don’t know where that came from. Must be the result of reading two years of Questionable Content strips over the past few days.
I didn’t take any pictures at ACRL Northwest because my camera is currently being fixed by Canon. However, there is a Flickr tag for the photos other people took. Right now Jessamyn is the only one who has uploaded and tagged photos from the conference, but hopefully the other photographers I saw there will add theirs soon.
“The Emerging Youth Literacy Landscape of Joy” -Dr. Anthony Bernier (San Jose State University)
New Youth Literacies
- state of current research
- research shifted from what young people knew to how they knew it
- young people learn bibliographic skills differently from adults
- as a result, pedagogy itself must become more flexible
- ethnographic research can help us
- gaps in research
- students are reduced to one-dimensional themes
- information seeking is individual
- games structure and play can inform us about youth information seeking
- young people are viewed only as information consumers
- libraries need to be asking why questions about young people information seeking choices
- new paths for research
- consider the daily life of young people
- email is now just a quaint way to communicate with old people
- New Youth Literacy – young people as literacy producers
- fugitive literacy produced in small lots, non-sequential, and non-serial; using all forms of media – ephemera
- Berkeley High School Slang Dictionary, 2002
- Information futures and young people
- emerging technologies for education – The Horizon Report 2006 Edition – collaboration and social computing needs to be embraced by university libraries – IM reference, Flickr, Skype, pod/webcasting, etc.
- future challenges
- intellectual property
- continuing information literacy skills
- technical support
“A Sensible Approach to New Technologies in Libraries: How do you work Library 2.0 into your 1.5 library with your 1.23 staff and your .98 patrons?” – Jessamyn West
- It isn’t about being expert on the latest and greatest, it’s about being flexible enough to learn the technologies you and your patrons use.
- Smart people read the manual – knowing how to use tools to solve your problems is almost the same as solving them on your own.
- In the end, it’s what you want out of your computer.
- Web 2.0: “Your cats have profiles on Catster.”
- Library 2.0 is a service philosophy: being willing to try new things and constantly evaluating your services – look outside the library world to find solutions to internal problems – the Read/Write Web
- Librarian 2.0: not being the bottleneck between patrons and the information they want
- Email is for talking to your colleagues.
- Technocracy lives in chat.
- “Internet interprets censorship as damage and routes around it.” — so do our users
- “Blogs are like courseware, only easy to use.”
- “Pew reports are like crack to librarians.”
- It doesn’t matter if you think Wikipedia is good or bad. The reality is that’s where the eyeballs are.
- Open APIs allow people to do nerdy type of stuff – mashups turn nifty things into tools you use for work.
- People who have broadband connections are the ones interacting with the internet, and web-based tools are being created for them, not for dialup people.
I really liked this talk. Jessamyn is an engaging speaker.
“Web 2.0 Is the Web” or “We’re All Millenials Now” – Rachel Bridgewater
del.icio.us tag “menucha06”
- “born digital people”
- Match the tool to the job – you can learn how to use them, so the question is do you need it?
- How does Web 2.0 effect scholarship? Sort of is the original vision of what the web would be – everyone is a publisher and information is shared freely.
- What is 2.0 for librarians?
- web as platform
- radical openness: open source, open standards (API, etc.)
- flattened hierarchy
- user focused
- micro-content: blog post as unit of content; atomization of content
- Web 1.0 is a framework based on the print world – the NetGens don’t need them
Web 2.0 that enhances library stuff
- Social bookmarks can be constantly evolving bibliographies.
- Blogs are a platform for sharing scholarly ideas that are not developed as a part of complex papers or monographs, and they allow for more immediate discourse.
- Networked books (Library Journal article about the social book) – how do they effect our ideas of authorship when they can be created and contributed to by anonymous writers via wikis and other similar tools? See Lawrence Lessig’s book Code. Does canon mean anything anymore?
- Peer review – can it be replaced by real-time peer review through comments and/or wiki edits? “open peer review”
- Open data – using distributed computing networks to crunch numbers – more than just searching for aliens. Link to the raw data from the online journal article. Libraries could/should be the server repositories.
Maybe we should be listening to our patrons to find out where information is going. Maybe Wikipedia is the future. Instead of saying that our databases are like the Reader’s Guide, we should be saying they’re like Wikipedia, only created by known scholars and proven to be authoritative.
updated to fix the tweaky code — didn’t have time to do it until now — sorry!
Internet Librarian – the conference for the library geeks with well funded travel budgets.
Today I got a program book for Internet Librarian in the mail. I’ve been reading the buzz about this conference all over the blogosphere, so I decided to give it another thought. I checked the dates and it butts up against ACRL-OR/WA, but I’d have all morning on the 26th for travel, so I started browsing through the program. Looks like there will be an interesting collection of presenters and topics. I was almost set on going until I flipped to the registration form and saw the cost. Okay, $400 for a conference isn’t too bad, as far as these things go, but $185 per night (plus taxes and fees) for the hotel rooms is outrageous! It’s even more stunning when the literature calls it a discounted rate. NASIG has been in very nice hotels in large cities for the past few conferences and never has the room rate been over $110 per night. Internet Librarian should look at getting some real discounts or moving to a location that is more affordable. Until then, I’ll continue to read the buzz from the A-list bloggers who attend the conference.
I hope everyone had a lovely Christmas. Mine has improved as the day has gone by, but I spent most of it sleeping in between coughing fits. I just set up my new iPod Nano, which makes me very happy. Cranium Hoopla with my Dad and my grandparents wasn’t as much fun as it was with a bunch of librarians at ACRL WA/OR, but I think it will go over well with my friends. My sister has already blogged about her gifts, including the t-shirt I gave her.
I found out last week that Wishing Chair has all of their albums available on iTunes, including some that are currently out of print. I highly recommend spending some of those gift card credits on Wishing Chair songs. I recommend Bully Circus, Copernicus, Now, If Wishes Were Horses, and Singing With the Red Wolves to get you started.
More thoughts, links, and general blabbing on open access publishing.
On the LIBLICENSE-L, Rick Anderson recently brought up the question of whether or not the American Libraries Association (ALA) has considered going to an open access publishing model for it’s publications. It seems that the Medical Library Association has one open access journal, although it isn’t listed in the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) at this time and is only available through PubMedCentral. Oddly enough, they do have subscription rates. The Science and Technology Section of the Association of College and Research Libraries (ACRL) (a part of ALA) has made their Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship quarterly available online through an open access model.
As I mentioned yesterday, my dean asked me to put together some information about open access for the other librarians here and to come up with ways that we could be involved with the open access movement. I’ve been surfing around the web and in databases this afternoon, looking for articles and other information that can help me distill this nebulous thing down to something I and my colleagues can digest. I was surprised by how many titles were listed on the DOAJ page for library and information science. There is only one that I recognize imediately as being reputable, and that is D-Lib Magazine. Also, like any list of journals, there are likely to be title changes and publications that have ceased.
I meant to write more than I did last week, since there are so many things going on with libraries right now. However, I had a full week at work which included a day-long symposium and a several day-long conference. Oh, and I was quoted in a recent article in the Lexington Herald-Leader.
has some information and links about scholarly communication
My favorite panel at ACRL was on developing home-grown systems to keep track of the library’s electronic resources. One of the presenters, Adam Chandler, has co-created a web hub for “developing administrative metadata for electronic resource management”. In other words, it’s a collaboration of library techies from all over trying to create a standard for electronic resource management. What’s even more cool is that Norm Medeiros of Haverford College has offered to make their Electronic Resources Tracking System (ERTS) database structure available for free to anyone who wants it. The catch is that there is absolutely no tech support.
It is disheartening to have been in the midst of all this fabulous library technology while at the same time Iraq’s National Library and National Museum were looted and burned.
ALA changed the design of their website last week and has really ticked off quite a number of folks. Jessamyn West has commented on it frequently over the past week, and Karen G. Schneider sent a well-articulated complaint to the ALA Council. No word on whether ALA will modify the site. It looks to me like they are leaning heavily on FrontPage and ColdFusion.